Last weekend at the UN Climate Change Conference in Bali, UN member countries agreed on a road map to hammer out the post-2012 replacement for the Kyoto treaty, after a dramatic last-minute reversal of position of the US delegation. Today, the House passed an energy bill that will increase the fuel efficiency standard for all vehicles by 40% to 35 miles per gallon by 2020. The bill also requires that ethanol use increase 6-fold by 2022. The bill was sent to the White House. (See here & here.)
During the coming century, our nation's climate policy and energy policy will become more and more entangled and intertwined, simply because fossil fuels, the principal sources of greenhouse gases, happen to be also our principal energy sources. Let's not forget, however, that they are not equivalent to each other.
| Factors influencing energy policy-making |
Sources of green house gases |
Climate warming Energy independence & security Scarcity of energy sources Economic growth / job security Surging worldwide demand Rising political influence of developing nations Consumer protection Price stability Energy & financial market stability Politics / vested interests
|
Fossil fuels Livestocks Agricultural activities Land use & wetland changes Landfill emission Refrigeration systems Fertilizers |
As shown in the table, an energy policy must address various issues other than global warming. Meanwhile, a climate policy needs to address factors not associated with fossil energy use. For example, livestock feeding and agricultural activities have been known to account for around 15% of greenhouse gas emissions. Also, the global nature of climate change requires much greater international interactions than energy.
At this point, almost all factors influencing our energy policy are moving it closer and closer to our climate policy. Energy independence urges development of non-fossil energy sources (although coals, which are abundant domestically, satisfy this requirement). Declining worldwide oil reserves require development of new energy sources (although abundant coals can satisfy this end too). Even China is gradually waking to the reality that it cannot sustain strong economic growth if sea level rises dramatically and flooding or droughts become more severe.
These factors, nevertheless, may someday move away from their current direction, pulling our energy policy from our climate policy. (For example, if Mid-East stabilizes, or enormous new fossil energy reserves are discovered.) If that happens, oil & other fossil energy prices may remain low, disrupting markets for clean technologies and carbon credits. In that case, climate policies may encounter greater conflicts with energy policies.
We'll need to be aware of this possibility. And, at the same time, should work to find ways to reduce the amount of green house gases our farms' manures send to the sky!
Please click the link below for the Chinese version.
聯合國氣候變化會議上週末在巴厘島閉幕。因為美國代表團在最後一刻戲劇性的逆轉其立場,各會員國終於得以通過了一份工作大綱,預計依此在兩年後協議出一份取代京都協定的氣候條約。而在另一角的美國,眾議院今天通過了一項能源法案,將在2020年前提高所有車輛的平均燃油效率標準40%至每加侖35英里。此外,該法案還規定乙醇燃油(Ethanol)的使用量須在2022年前增加6倍。該法案現在將送交總統簽字。
這兩件新聞,一個與氣候政策有關,另一個則與能源政策有關。但事實上,在下一個世紀,我們的氣候政策和能源政策,將會越來越糾纏交織在一起,因為化石能源(fossil energy)不僅是主要溫室氣體的來源,也恰巧是我們的主要能源來源。不過,這兩項政策各有其不同的著眼點和必須考慮之因素。
| 影響能源政策的因素 |
溫室效應氣體之排放源
|
氣候暖化 能源獨立及安全 日益短缺的能源來源 經濟成長/工作保護 洶湧澎湃的全球能源需求 開發中國家日益擴大的政治影響力 消費者保護 物價穩定 能源與金融市場穩定 政治/既得利益者的利益
|
化石燃料 畜禽糞便 農業活動 土地利用與濕地變化 填埋場廢氣排放 冷卻系統 肥料 |
如上表所示,除全球暖化這一因素外,能源政策必須考量解決其他許多不同的問題。同樣的,氣候政策需要解決許多和化石能源的使用無關的因素。舉例來說,我們知道牲畜飼養和農業活動佔了約15%的溫室氣體排放量。此外,氣候變化這一議題比能源問題更需要廣泛的國際互動。
目前,能源政策與氣候政策有越來越整合的趨勢。能源獨立的需求導致發展非化石能源的需要(雖然美國國內不虞匱乏的煤礦也可滿足這個需要)。而世界的石油儲備量正迅速下降,以致各國極力尋求新的能源種類(雖然豐富的煤礦也能達到這個目地)。即便中國也正逐步發覺,如果海平面迅速上升,加上洪水或乾旱變得更為嚴峻,中國不可能持續維持經濟的強勁成長。
但是,這些因素可能有一天會偏離目前的方向,進而拉離能源政策和氣候政策。(譬如中東情勢穩定下來,或是發現巨大的新的能源礦藏。)如果出現這種情況,石油和其他能源價格可能持續走低,而擾亂了綠色能源技術投資和碳信用額交易市場。在這種情況下,氣候政策與能源政策的衝突可預見會急速增加。
這種情況的確有可能會發生。在持續觀察的同時,我們不妨努力設法減低由畜禽糞便排到藍天白雲上的溫室氣體數量!